Quality & trust

Supplier Evaluation

Pérola do Tempo, S.A. periodically evaluates its suppliers and service providers using criteria suited to the nature of each supply relationship, with the aim of promoting quality, reliability and continuous improvement.

Supplier categories 4 types Criteria adapted to each activity
Evaluation scale 1 — 3 From non-compliance to compliance
Approval ≥ 1.5 Approved supplier
Evaluation Periodic Performance monitoring

Evaluation process

An evaluation adapted to each type of supplier

The evaluation criteria vary according to the goods or services supplied. This allows Pérola do Tempo to assess supplier performance in a proportionate and relevant way, taking into account quality, deadlines, service and the ability to respond to any incidents or complaints.

Where relevant to the supplier or service concerned, additional factors may also be considered, including legal and regulatory compliance, data protection and information security, documentation and traceability, and responsible sourcing.

Evaluation criteria

Criteria by supplier category

Each category is assessed according to the factors that are most relevant to the corresponding supply relationship.

01

General suppliers

Goods for sale, packaging and transport

  • Compliance with delivery or execution deadlines
  • Quantities and references supplied
  • Product quality upon receipt
  • Complaint handling
02

Foundry suppliers

Collection and execution services

  • Compliance with collection deadlines
  • Compliance with execution deadlines
  • Complaint handling
03

Financial & online marketing services

Platforms, systems and digital services

  • Ease of use for Pérola do Tempo
  • Ease of use for the customer
  • Customer support
04

Marketing service providers

Strategic and operational services

  • Compliance with the meeting plan
  • Effectiveness of the proposals presented
  • Customer support

Classification

A clear and objective evaluation scale

Each applicable criterion is evaluated on a scale from 1 to 3. The overall result determines whether the supplier remains approved.

1

Does not comply

The evaluated criterion does not meet the defined requirements.

2

Intermediate compliance

An intermediate level of compliance with the evaluated criterion.

3

Complies

The evaluated criterion meets the defined requirements.

Supplier status

Approval and follow-up

The final classification determines the supplier’s position on the list of approved suppliers.

Not approved

< 1.5

Suppliers with a final classification below 1.5 are considered not approved.

A new contract or order may only be awarded with prior validation by Management. The supplier will receive written notice, preferably by email, informing them of their removal from the list of approved suppliers.

Approved

≥ 1.5

Suppliers with a final classification equal to or above 1.5 are considered approved.

No specific communication is required and the supplier remains on the list of approved suppliers.

Additional diligence

Cross-cutting criteria, where applicable

Depending on the nature of the supplier, service or goods supplied, additional compliance and risk factors may be considered as part of supplier management.

01

Legal compliance

Compliance with applicable legal, regulatory and contractual requirements.

02

Data & security

Data protection and information security whenever the service involves access to or processing of information.

03

Traceability

Adequate documentation and traceability of goods and materials whenever relevant.

04

Responsible sourcing

Origin, responsible sourcing and supply-chain diligence whenever applicable to the goods concerned.

Supplier relationships built on rigour and trust

The periodic evaluation of suppliers supports consistent quality standards, more reliable operations and the continuous improvement of the products and services made available by Pérola do Tempo and Loja do Ouro.

Reference document · 31/01/2024